<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Digital Tectonics &#187; biomass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wsadt.net/tag/biomass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wsadt.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:18:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scheme Activities</title>
		<link>http://www.wsadt.net/2010/02/scheme-activities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wsadt.net/2010/02/scheme-activities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mateusz Orzel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wsadt.net/?p=1022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following the previous idea of the Energy Awareness Centre being responsible for research on renewable energy, I am going for the BIOMASS. The decission is based on site-specific factors, mostly climate, however also on the tradition of using coal (fossilized Biomass) in the area. The diagram shows roughly the main scheme activities]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="/Users/Mat/Desktop/digital%20tectonics/thesis/0802/programme%20ideass.jpg" alt="" /><img class="size-full wp-image-1023 aligncenter" src="http://www.wsadt.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/programme-ideass.jpg" alt="programme ideass" width="500" height="226" /></p>
<p>Following the previous idea of the Energy Awareness Centre being responsible for research on renewable energy, I am going for the BIOMASS. The decission is based on site-specific factors, mostly climate, however also on the tradition of using coal (fossilized Biomass) in the area.</p>
<p>The diagram shows roughly the main scheme activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wsadt.net/2010/02/scheme-activities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

